-
"Hot Take: The Harry Potter adaptation should have been an animated show from the beginning"
-
via Jessica Fadel
Harry Potter book sitting on top of another open book.
Image for illustrative purposes.
-
via u/josue136868
-
via u/josue136868
-
There are plenty of different adaptations out there, some more successful than others. The thing I learned about them is that no matter how they are executed, people will always have criticism and something to say. If the adaptation is very different from the source, fans will complain about it, but if the adaptation is word-for-word accurate, fans will also complain about it. There is no winning here, really.
When it comes to the Harry Potter past adaptation, AKA the movies, it's safe to say the general reaction was very positive, but as a fan of the book, there were many plotlines and elements missing that a longer TV show could easily fix. Does that mean a live-action series is really necessary when it hasn't even been 20 years since the first film was released? Time can only tell.
The idea of an animated show is definitely interesting, as it eliminates many risks in putting out a live-action TV series, most importantly the subject of time. When working with young actors, the schedule must be very tight, and that could definitely affect some important details in the series. When you use animation, well, you don't have to worry about your main character growing a mustache.
-
via u/josue136868
-
via u/Irauch95
-
via u/Adriene-Complex-8770
-
via u/Soxley02
-
via u/NoAlien
-
via u/Annoying_pirate
-
via u/aniztar
-
via Caroline Veronez
A woman reading a Harry Potter book.
Stock photo unrelated.
-
via u/Embarrassed_Bake1073
-
via u/lukelawlz
-
via u/lukelawlz
-
via u/Former_Visual_3940
-
via u/ta_202
-
via u/Feisty_System_4751
Want More? Follow Us and Add Us as a Preferred Source on Google.